Sunday, December 16, 2012

Close Reading (12/16)


The Tarnish of the Electoral College

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/opinion/the-tarnish-of-the-electoral-college.html

Many debate over whether or not the Electoral College should be kept in practice.  Some believe it to be unfair while others think it is representational.  The article “The Tarnish of the Electoral College”, proposes that the Electoral College should be revised through the use of diction, details and syntax.
                  The author’s intent is to persuade readers against the use of the Electoral College.  When the author uses words such as defective and abolished to describe the system, it is clear that he is not pleased with how we elect our president.  These words are harsh and have definite meanings suggesting a strong disgust in our system.  As readers see these negative words describing our voting system, then they are more likely to turn against or at least view the Electoral College in a negative light.
                  Through the use of details the readers is informed that the two major parties only call for reform when the Electoral College votes for the opponent.  When it is written how the Sun Belt is rising and Democratic states were losing population, the author suggests that the only reason Republicans were in support for the system.  Where as when younger individuals, Hispanics, and African-Americans had a rising population in in states such as “Nevada, Colorado, and Virginia” the Democrats were pleased the Electoral College.  Due to the parties only supporting this system when it is in their favor suggests the need for reform because it is not operating in a way that benefits all. 
                  Syntax is also used to show the flaws in the Electoral College.  When the author writes, “The problems with the Electoral College—born in the appeasement to slave states…” the use of separating the later part of the sentence emphasizes how the Electoral College is in place because of our horrible past of slavery.  By holding onto the Electoral College, we are in essence, holding onto slavery.
                  From the use of word choice, the details chosen to describe why parties like the Electoral College, and the structure of certain sentences support the author’s claim that the voting process needs reform.  The article clearly suggests that the electoral process is not just and in order to be a true democratic nation our election process needs to be more representative.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Open Prompt (12/9)



2003. According to critic Northrop Frye, "Tragic heroes are so much the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divisive lightning." Select a novel or play in which a tragic figure functions as an instrument of the suffering of others. Then write an essay in which you explain how the suffering brought upon others by that figure contributes to the tragic vision of the work as a whole.

                  In Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, Willy Loman is a tragic figure.  Readers see that a capitalistic society leads Willy to stubbornly keep trying to fit into the elite class.  As a result his philosophy for succeeding in life, and the choices he makes hinders his sons’ development in life.
                  Willy thinks that if one is well liked then he surely will succeed in life.  While Willy is a part of the American dream he is missing one keep component, working hard; he wants to become wealthy without having to work.  Due to Willy’s thinking about being a part of the wealthy class and being on top of society, he encourages his sons to develop the same mentality.  Throughout Biff and Happy’s life Willy has taught them to be popular, because as he says, “personality always wins the day” (Miller, 65).  Subsequently Biff doesn’t work hard in school; he copies the answers from his friend Bernard.  Biff believes, as his father has told him, that as long as he is thought of well he will go far in life.  This philosophy is a misconstrued derivative of capitalistic theory, which encourages hard work which then leads to success.  However, Willy misses the fact that he must work hard; he has an idea of being wealthy and providing for his family but he cannot stop thinking that success is derived from being well liked, and subsequently his teachings hinder his sons’ opportunity for success because they don’t know how to work hard.
                  The actions taken by Willy also lead to his family’s suffering.  Willy decides not to follow his brother, Ben, to Alaska where he can make more money, and instead his stubbornness causes him to stay in New York and try to win in the epicenter of capitalism.  This hurts his family as they struggle to pay the bills.  Again when Biff catches his father cheating on his mother, he decides to give up on life.  Biff still believes that he will be able to succeed because he is well liked, but he has lost all respect for his father.  As a result Biff is unable to keep a steady job and earn a living because his father’s actions prevented him from pursuing a career in life, which could have led to success.  The choices Willy makes in life cause his family to break apart and suffer as they are always arguing over why they haven’t experienced prosperity.
                  Willy’s teachings to his children and the choices he makes in life lead to the tragic end of the play.  Readers feel sorry for Willy as they realize that his dream to succeed in a capitalistic society fails.  All of his effort to reach the top leads him to an unstable mental condition and eventually his death.  Not only is Willy’s death tragic but the fact that his son Happy wishes to follow in his footsteps and try to reach the top in such a society so all will know that his father did not die in vain.  Willy is the catalyst to his family’s failure to thrive in a capitalistic society.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Death of a Salesman


Author:  Arthur Miller grew up in New York City and his family was respected.  He is of Polish and Jewish descent so he is a minority.  While living in New York City the stock market crashed and his family lost all of their money.  His background helps explain where Death of a Salesman comes from.  Miller sees what he thinks is a fault in the capitalistic world from living in New York City, the capital of capitalism, and from experiencing the effects of the Great Depression.
Setting:  The play takes place in New York City in the 1930s-1940s.  The Loman’s house is transparent is surrounded by numerous apartment buildings that prevent sunlight from reaching their backyard.  Part of the story is in a Boston hotel room but this is part of a flashback in Willy’s memory.
Plot:  The story revolves around Willy Loman and his life.  There isn’t a main purpose to the story (in my opinion) but that Willy is trying to succeed in a capitalistic society.  Willy is trying to achieve what he sees as the gateway to success.  He thinks that if he is well liked then he will automatically become rich.  The other part of the plot is Willy trying to mold Biff into the man he wants him to be.
Characters:
Willy:  He is the husband to Linda and he is struggling in the capitalistic society.  He never seems to be able to achieve success because either he holds himself back or Linda does for various reasons.  Willy likes to think big and has a tendency to exaggerate; he is prone to hyperbole.  His actions could lead one to think that he is an uncaring individual as he cheats on his wife and taught his sons to live by principles that have set them up for failure.  His mind is in an unstable condition as he keeps reliving his past.
Linda:  Willy’s wife may be perceived as selfish because she held her husband back from the one opportunity he had at success.  She is a woman who prefers continuity and convinced herself that everything would work out in the capitalistic world.  Whatever her reasoning is, Willy can never fit into such a society.  However, she is a caring and a dedicated wife.
Biff:  He is the favored son and doesn’t wish to be molded by his father because he sees that Willy’s principles will and have failed him in life.  Biff was good at football and had potential, however, he does steal a lot.  At the end thought Biff finds himself and knows how to start leading a life that can help him achieve what the wants.
Happy:  He is dumb, in my opinion, and will simply follow in his footsteps.  So to understand Happy just reread the play and cross out Willy’s name and insert Happy’s.  Happy is the picture of neglect, neither of his parents cares about what he does with his life and they focus all of their attention on Biff.
Charley:  He is a next-door neighbor to Willy and he has achieved success because he knows what it means to work hard.  Charley, although he is often disgusted with Willy, stands by him and helps him out like a true friend.   Charley may enjoy Willy’s company because Willy is filled with life and hope.
Bernard:  He is a foil to Biff and the son of Charley.  Bernard was successful in school and listens to his father’s principles to earn his way in life.



                  The author employs flash backs to achieve a shift in time as part of his style in Death of a Salesman..  Imagery is used to describe one of the shifts in time as Willy talks about how it would be great if his boys carried his suitcases in Boston for him, and everyone could see how well liked he is.
                  The shifts in time are used to show Willy’s life in a capitalism capitalistic society and how the effects of this society lead to failure.  As a result the tone is melancholy yet hopeful as the characters fight through tough times and in the process find themselves and their purpose in life.  Readers know that Biff will be fine in life when he says, “Why am I trying to become what I don’t want to be . . . when all I want is out there, waiting for me the minute I say I know who I am” (132).  Biff understands the pitfalls of capitalism and how to avoid them.  This is an important quote because it tells Americans that one can still have an American dream even if it isn’t within a capitalistic system.
                  A symbol for their struggles is the Loman’s backyard, which doesn’t receive sunlight.  It symbolizes that Willy is too late in training his children to work hard to achieve wealth.  This symbol is from the point of view of someone who sees what a capitalistic society does and how it operates.  As the shifts in time occur the reader sees the symbols in the play and the point of view of the story as it directs them to understand Willy’s past and how capitalism leads him to make the decisions that the does.



Through out the play American capitalism is depicted as a society in which people are taken in, exploited and when they are no longer of use, they are dismissed and cast off.  The title of the work, Death of a Salesman, demonstrates the outcome of this theme.  Willy Loman literally dies in the play; the effects of capitalism bring about his death.  The play is a tragedy but Willy is no epic hero, instead he is a working class man who wants to become rich.  The title suggests a dichotomy; capitalism promotes the American dream yet in the very pursuit of this dream and a better life it is the very thing that kills the working man.
This theme is also supported by the setting, which is New York City, the capital of capitalism with its vast wealth and the things wealth can produce.  The people who hold positions of status in New York City are most likely born into the elite class, Willy is not of this class.  Willy is better with his hands, as in he should have been a carpenter.  He does not have the family or connections that is needed to succeed as a salesman in a capitalistic society.  He tries to advance in his position but is unable to do so, and when he no longer can perform his duties, he is fired.  Thus capitalism lures men in to be used and when they are ineffective or too old to work, they are disposed of.
Not only does setting reinforce this theme, but also the plot that revolves around success and achieving a status of notability.  Willy tries to gain a position so that he no longer has to travel but he never can get it, and he thinks that if he is well liked then he will surely succeed.  However, this is not the case, he gives his whole life to capitalism only to turn into a man without friends, without a job, and without a stable family.  At the end of the play Happy is determined to win in a capitalistic society show his father didn’t die in vain; he thinks that he has a chance of winning, but he doesn’t realize that his family doesn’t fit into the capitalistic mold.
Willy’s philosophy of being well liked hinders his success in the capitalistic world. When Willy is talking about how if he is surround by his two sons who worship him, carrying his bags in Boston, then people will see him as being popular so then he will surely be well liked.  Through this description readers see that his philosophy is based on false values.  Although, they are false, this scene shows the desire of many Americans who wish to be a success or at least appear to be a success in the capitalistic world.  They think that if they get notoriety then they will be content in life, and automatically become a part of the elite society.  However, this is not the case, capitalism looks appealing but it really is only rewarding to those who have an automatic position in it. 
For Willy it is too hard to fight against the forces of capitalism to succeed.  When Charley says, “He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding, on a smile and a shoeshine.  And when they start not smiling back--that’s an earthquake… and you’re finished” (138).  He means that Willy’s job is tough and takes skill, but setbacks in his sales defeat his confidence and start the path to failure.  This is an important quote because it shows that the forces of capitalism are too strong to overcome and will lead to one’s demise.
A main symbol in the play is Howard’s recording machine.  The recorder has Howard’s daughter, son, and wife recorded on it, and he talks about the maid and how she can’t work it.  Willy is all of these people except the son.  He adores Howard like the daughter and all of importance in the capitalistic society; he looks up to them.  Then he is the wife who is embarrassing because he can’t do his job, and he is the maid because he doesn’t understand that times are changing.  The recorder symbolizes success and new innovation, which Willy is lacking.  Willy isn’t the right type of man and therefore is subject to be in the shadows of those who rule society. 
The author’s style further supports Willy’s weak personality.  Miller uses shifts in time to show the audience that Willy isn’t strong enough to stand up to Linda and say no we are going to Alaska where there is a chance for success.  Instead he lets Linda run over him.  Due to Willy being weak, he doesn’t have the right character or understanding to succeed in this competitive environment.  As a result the society choses to take Willy in and convinces him that he can be something so that he will work hard, but when he is no longer needed, he is dismissed.    
The narrative voice shifts depending on which character is speaking but it shows the reader how people are affected by capitalism and its influence on their thoughts.  Subsequently the tone of the play shifts as well but for many characters it shifts between depression and hopefulness.  The tone is a result of the theme because the characters, while aware of the high probability against achieving the American dream, still think that they can win. 


Saturday, December 1, 2012

Responses to Course Material (12/2)


We covered tragedies, which was helpful because I was able to see the differences in how tragedies were written throughout time.  In the modern form of tragedy society is seen as the problem, and I was able to connect this back to “Death of a Salesman”.  Willy cannot succeed in life because he was not born into the right family.  Capitalism rules society and dictates who is in the elite class. 
Although some may feel sympathetic toward Willy, I do not.  This may seem harsh but I honestly just don’t like Willy; he is very annoying.  His principles of being well liked frustrated me even more because it is false and cannot help you succeed in life.  I felt as if his teaching hinders his children’s’ development into strong men who can earn their way in life.  On the contrary Charley and Bernard were less bothersome to me because they have values that demonstrate that they understand hard work and the benefits of it. 
While reading I wondered why is it that Willy’s values show signs of laziness while Charley’s demonstrate a typical attitude for the American dream?  Upon reflection I see Charley, as being more in line with traditional values while Willy is more modern.  Willy just wants to become rich quickly and not work for it.  I think that this can apply to America today because some people don’t understand what it means to work hard anymore.  Perhaps this is another point Miller was trying to make through “Death of a Salesmen”.
I cannot say that I am sorry that we have finished “Death of a Salesman” and from what little we have read in “Hamlet” I have been enjoying it.  “Hamlet” is a tragedy so I am looking forward to comparing it with the more modern tragedy of “Death of a Salesman”.  So far I have noticed that instead of following characters of lower social status and blaming society for one’s problems, Shakespeare focuses more on the nobility, and the interactions among these characters, as well as supernatural forces.  However, both bring real life into their plays.  Miller critiques the world of capitalism, while Shakespeare focuses on the history of England’s kings, queens and their affairs.